Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Logo.svg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Logo.svg edit

Poorly licensed and incorrectly described. A better version has been uploaded and has been used in most wiki pages. Jeromesandilanico (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's exactly the same file, only with bigger transparent borders. EXACTLY. Excactly the same license is used. EXACTLY. Incorrectly described? No. Poorly licensed? No. And it's the same resolution - SVG files are scalable to any size - so there is no "better resolution". I could even say that the image from you is copied from me. (File:Galaxy Note 3 logo.svg) Speedy keep! --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Speedy keep and close as an abusive deletion request. He tried edit warring this version of the logo into the actual article with the same claims.. ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Speedy delete! My version of the svg logo is Not a copy of his as evident by the source I derived the file with. Its not only him who can make an svg file. I did not engage in edit wars with anyone and we just talked about it. I did not do it abusively, in fact it was TheMostAmazingTechnik who is harassing and abusing me with the deletion of all the images i uploaded by even though it was properly licensed under creative commons in flickr via the uploader with permission.Jeromesandilanico (talk) 02:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the software is copyrighted (and it is) and you simply relicense that, you can't use that image - the software is still copyrighted. That's what I've learned here and seen on my own images earlier. --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But if its an image issued by the copyright holder, that's a different story. But still, I don't get why you're being so hostile about this. And by the way, there is no speedy deletion policy on Commons (its merely "proposed"). ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Folks! Relax! No reason given for deletion. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]