Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Logo.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Logo.svg[edit]

Poorly licensed and incorrectly described. A better version has been uploaded and has been used in most wiki pages. Jeromesandilanico (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's exactly the same file, only with bigger transparent borders. EXACTLY. Excactly the same license is used. EXACTLY. Incorrectly described? No. Poorly licensed? No. And it's the same resolution - SVG files are scalable to any size - so there is no "better resolution". I could even say that the image from you is copied from me. (File:Galaxy Note 3 logo.svg) Speedy keep! --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Speedy keep and close as an abusive deletion request. He tried edit warring this version of the logo into the actual article with the same claims.. ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Speedy delete! My version of the svg logo is Not a copy of his as evident by the source I derived the file with. Its not only him who can make an svg file. I did not engage in edit wars with anyone and we just talked about it. I did not do it abusively, in fact it was TheMostAmazingTechnik who is harassing and abusing me with the deletion of all the images i uploaded by even though it was properly licensed under creative commons in flickr via the uploader with permission.Jeromesandilanico (talk) 02:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the software is copyrighted (and it is) and you simply relicense that, you can't use that image - the software is still copyrighted. That's what I've learned here and seen on my own images earlier. --TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But if its an image issued by the copyright holder, that's a different story. But still, I don't get why you're being so hostile about this. And by the way, there is no speedy deletion policy on Commons (its merely "proposed"). ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: Folks! Relax! No reason given for deletion. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]