User talk:Panam2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Panam2014!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Yemen war detailed map.png). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.
Érico (msg) 18:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New vector maps![edit]

Hello! Just wanted to notice that the vector versions of the current civil wars maps ,except Iraq and Syria, has been uploaded. As you may know vector images can take much less size than other types of images (.png) and can be zoomed without quality loss. If you want to make any updates please make sure to apply them on new vector maps .
Thank you!:) Ali Zifan 08:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Yemen war detailed map.png). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

If you want to see the sources check out the Yemeni Civil War detailed map, or external sources. Thanks for reading.

Tiseptiko (msg) 10:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TN-ARP-2016.svg[edit]

Hello,

Please can you edit or update File:TN-ARP-2016.svg after the recent changes: Ennahdha 69, Nidaa Tounes 56, Bloc libre 28, Union patriotique libre: 14 seats, Front populaire: 15 seats, Hors: 15 seats, Afek Tounes: 10 seats, Bloc social-démocrate: 10 seats.

Thank you very much.--Mohatatou (talk) 23:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yemeni Civil War.svg[edit]

Ok, to make it short:

I really don't know if you or K!lluminati is right with the sources. I only make the changes after the Template. If you think that his changes are wrong you can revert his changes there, if you have a source for your claim. I'll include it in the map then. However, stop just blindly revert the map. You know, it also takes me time to make the changes at the .svg map and I changed much more than only this Houthi-thing, no I also showed changes like the reconquest of nearly all of Ma'rib governorate, reconquest of al-Hawtah and much more. Please stop it and discuss it out at the template.--Ermanarich (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ermanarich: No, if you want to make the map , discuss first. Also , you have to map without amendments from Saba . --Panam2014 (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You don't seem to understand me. I am neutral. If you mean that Wald Rabi' District and others are not under control of the Houthis, then change it at the module, not here. Because here you are not only reverting the changes of which you think they are wrong but also many others. Alternatively, you could also edit the .svg map, but stop to simply revert it. It's not me who have to discuss, since I only transmit the informations from the template to the .svg map. And don't tell me that the things are to be discussed here and not at the template talk page. In the description of the svg map it says clearly:

"Source The map image is based on Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map. Used blank map :Yemen location map.svg"

Again. If you discuss it out at the module and change it there, no problem. I'll include it in the next version. But not in this way. Please stop you destructive attitude. Thanks. --Ermanarich (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Oh and I looked at it more exactly. For his changes he only used Sabanews for the Houthi control of Wald Rabi'. And exactly this town, as you can see if you look at the template and the .svg map is not included in the .svg map.--Ermanarich (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ermanarich: And for his first modifications made via sabanews , can return as well? Also, please discuss first. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which ones do you mean?--Ermanarich (talk) 18:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ermanarich: could you make map without it ? --Panam2014 (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DNR[edit]

Hello. I write message to you in our discussion about Novorussian flags [1]. Perhaps, it will be interesting to you --Nicolay Sidorov (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Samsung Galaxy Note7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Loving the nearly complete lack of bezel as well as the screen shape on my -vzreview LG G6.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch  English  magyar  português do Brasil  italiano  norsk  norsk bokmål  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  suomi  українська  svenska  sicilianu  中文(臺灣)  +/−

This image in particular shows a the phone's non-free desktop wallpaper so the original photographer may not publish it without permission from LG or whoever holds the copyright for the wallpaper. De728631 (talk) 13:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:-SM 150710 Bianca 0168 .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   16:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bianca in the city.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   17:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bianca Montage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   17:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hirak[edit]

Bonsoir je n'ai pas de photos sur ce thème. Amicalement, Thomon 6 oct 2019 23:17 (UTC). —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.249.73.113 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Please do not take this personally. TJH2018talk 16:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Panam2014. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

TJH2018talk 23:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Panam2014!
Tip: Add categories to your images
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

-- ~riley (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep up the good work.[edit]

Don't let them bully you. You're doing a good job

Multichill (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Galaxy S8 and S8+.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Méthode[edit]

Bonjour, Il faut apprendre à discuter avec les autres contributeurs. Si vous avez un désaccord, posez poliment une question à l'autre personne, mais ne faites pas appel à un admin à chaque fois. Si vous ne pouvez pas collaborer, il vaut mieux trouver un autre hobby. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: Salut. J'ai posté en PDD mais les contributeurs en question ne se justifient pas et ils m'insultent de vandale alors que je n'ai pas vandalisé. Ca ne dépend plus de moi. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:New haircut4.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:New haircut4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Locks of love 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TJH2018talk 15:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stop ping all admins. This is the last warning. Yann (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Yann: I have the right to ask the participants of the last discussion for the new. I would like to have the opinion of another admin. About legal information. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No. You have no right to ping all admins to make your point. You are becoming to be a nuisance here... Yann (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: Wikipedia and Commons are based on rules. I am willing to see what rule I have not respected. I think I will ask for mediation. I have seen others contributor who have pinged the others contributors. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yann, please do not exceed WP:TPO (or the Commons equivalent) in blanking posts to my talk: page. In cases of clear vandalism this is permitted, but Panam2014's post in this case was clearly no such thing. Even if against WP:CANVASS (which isn't a policy on Commons anyway), it would be an understandable and GF faux pas, not vandalism to be reverted. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Je te suggère la lecture de Commons:Staying_mellow/fr : l'idée est de ne pas importer ici les conflits de WPfr Clin. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 18:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Yann: I have waited many hours and I see no reason why I would not have the right to warn contributors interested in the subject, knowing that some voted against the conservaton. So what is your reason for this? --Panam2014 (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Qatar image edit[edit]

Thanks for your message. I am just going by the sources. And as per my information, the Thani interim government is in consequence to the internationally recognized Libyan House of Representatives. Do check this page for further information. While, I do concede that Libya's Tripoli-based government is also internationally recognized but it hasn't openly criticized Thani's move yet (to the best of my knowledge). And since both the House of Representatives and the Government of National Accord work in some semblance of a synchronization, so I don't think there is a valid reason to dispute the Libyan position on the map - yet. However, if in the coming weeks, the GNA disowns the actions of the Thani government, I would be happy to change the map.

Best, --Wiki.0hlic (talk) 11:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Update[edit]

Represented the Libyan region with hatching, to reflect its ambiguous status.

Best, --Wiki.0hlic (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch  English  français  italiano  magyar  português  sicilianu  русский  日本語  +/−


You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Qatar diplomatic crisis.svg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.


--Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wrongly reverted change.[edit]

Why did you revert the change in the Political Systems Map? Turkey is a parliamentary republic. Yes, they had a referendum about changing the system, but it will take effect by the end of 2019. Until it has not "happened", you can't simply change it. For example: what if they cancel the change before it gets effective? Same goes for Brexit. They're leaving, that's true, but until it hasn't happened we are not changing the maps of the EU. They still can withdraw from the Brexit, very unlikely, but still possible. That's why I ask you kindly to revert your revert. Best wishes --84.179.106.63 21:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 04:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Catégorie à plusieurs fichiers[edit]

Salut Tu sais comment appliquer une catégorie à plusieurs fichiers ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aide:Gadget-Cat-a-lot ? (à utiliser avec précaution : facile de se tromper). Ou tu fais allusion à autre chose ? Chaoborus (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Chaoborus: merci beaucoup. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:26th Parliament of Turkey.svg[edit]

I updated to file , thanks to your care..--Emreculha (talk) 20:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Western Sahara[edit]

I do not know how. However, the current depiction is one of the four valid ways to depict Western Sahara in maps, so it is not incorrect. Impru20 (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:2017 Southern Yemen Legislature.svg[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vanesse Hudgens 2014 (2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein talk 20:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Obligatory notification[edit]

COM:AN/B[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#May want to evaluate/keep an eye on this. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

GMGtalk 15:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy A8 (1).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy A8 (3).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy A8 (4).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dragon[edit]

Hi I would like to remove the Dragon but the photo is extract from a YT file. So I have planned to crop the file. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ginny Weasley2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brianna Haley (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Galaxy A8 (34).png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Galaxy A8 (34).png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zafar-ul-Haq (cropped).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zafar-ul-Haq (cropped).png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Saqib (talk) 07:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not remove a license[edit]

Hi, Never remove a license from a file description. When you tag a copyright violation, please inform the uploader. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Iphone x (23934042657).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Spam, no evidence that the wallpaper is free.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yann (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Galaxy S9+ display quality (40874421381).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Spam, no evidence that the wallpaper is free.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yann (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, GRuban (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So sorry, you're absolutely right. --GRuban (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@GRuban: thank you, it is not a problem. So could you remove the tag and ask an admin for a closure or could you make a closure ? --Panam2014 (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Marked it as withdrawn, but, sure, I guess I can ask an admin to close it out. [2] --GRuban (talk) 19:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Bob-(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Sophia and Me with Ponytails.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Donation-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2017 Armenian National Assembly Structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ZYjacklin (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Moaddem.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The youtube license is "Standard YouTube Licence" which means the entire video clip is copyrighted.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: SVG version[edit]

Done! Mnmazur (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't understand[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media from Hollywood To You

What do you want me to do? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: hi, I think the request should be closed and the files deleted. Two months is too long. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, but what do you want me to do? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: if you accept it, you could advise me. Should we do an AN? Talk about it in village pump or ask an admin in his talk page? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
DRs are backlogged. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The growing problem of obesity.jpg should be deleted, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alessio Di Zio - Portrait.jpg should be kept. Why should we jump the queue for this? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Problem?[edit]

What is your problem with the Turkish parliament diagram? All parliamentary diagrams are ordered from left to right. Locating Erdogan's party at the left makes no sense whatsoever and some people might even found that offensive. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 05:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Dereck Camacho: in Turkish politics, there are no really a right left political spectrum. Also, the original author of the diagram is a socketpuppet and have been blocked. So, the original's author style shouldn't be respected. Also, I have uploaded the file with the new repartition (IYI have lost 2 MP, one became MHP and another independent) so stop to upload an outdated version because the file is called "current". And as author of the most recent version (not outdated), I am opposed for the uploading of an uploaded version with right left spectrum. So, stop now. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You can't tell me what should I stop or no, and I'm not willing convince yet. Of course that Turkish politics works with right and left they're not aliens and you don't own the file. If you want you can call for a mediation or discuss it in the talk page until we reach consensus. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You can answer here if you want. Fine, upload an updated version with the right position or I will, just because other diagrams are defectuous that doesn't mean this should be thats another phalacy. About the other, I see no evidence that the author was blocked but even if he was is still ad hominem phallacy on your behalf, that doesn't changes the bottom of the issue nor the argument that the diagram should be like all the others. So, correct that or I will. Greets. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What I'm going to do is to make the diagram with the right seating, don't worry, and also with the correct right-left spectrum position. Feel free to report me for vandalism if you want. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 22:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh really? and what policy says that? Give me the policy that says I have to do that and I happily would comply. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 23:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Consensus doesn't work like that, if that's the case you didn't search for consensus to make the change on the first time, although valid as they may be anywhere in Commons there's a policy that give you any kind of control over the file "until some new change in seats is needed", your pulling that out of your butt. And don't need your aproval to change the order to the traditional spectrum nor I will spect it, as I say feel free to report for vandalism on that if you want. In any case I do remember you that in case of edit war the policy establish that the file would be reverted to the last version before the edit war started, so I strongly suggest you to avoid an edit war. I will wait a couple of hours for you to come into your senses I'm also open to alternatives besides your close to break the three reversion rule. So, I suggest you to calm down. I'm open to alternative suggestions if you want and to discuss the issue in the Talk page too, but in around two hours I will make the change and don't worry, I'll take into account the proper current seating. If you keep reverting me I will report the edit war for the admin to take the actions they consider fit. And, to be honest, I would have being more receptive if your attitud was different, but something like ordering "just stop" is pretty rude, not to mention to invent unexisting policies of ownership over files that nor even you're the author to begin with. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Again, this is getting circular. Your update doesn't give you any rights or control over the file. I'm not htreatening all the opposite I want admins to intervine because they'll be neutral. You did non-consensual changes too but if you'll continue reverting and causing an edit war fine, as you wish. I'll try to reason with you. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 01:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm not expecting the admin to give me the reason, I just want their most likely neutral input. Second I told you I'm not going to use the old distribution, the seating will be the same that you udpated, it will be the position in the spectrum what would be change, and that's a valid change that I can do whether you like it or not, as I said, you can report for vandalism if you want. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will see. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your being unpolite again and that can also be reported. I'm not "blackmailing" you, I'm telling you what I'm entitled to do and most patiently waiting until you calm down before doing it, and requesting you to discuss it on the talk page as you thankfully are now doing. And yes I welcome Aleats intervention, he's a great user and very experienced and I'm sure he will give an important input. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well whatever you think, I don't care, again feel free to report me for "blackmail". --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposal[edit]

Hi. I have a proposal for you that might solve the issue of the Turkish Parliament diagram.

You say that the left-right spectrum does not applies in Turkish politics, which I'm skeptical off, however the problem is that the funcion of the arch-style diagrams is to show a left-to-right order, thus not showing the at least presumed spectrum is confussing. But there's a possible solution, I came across a new programs that allows different designs for parliament diagrams, how about we make a diagram that shows how the Turkish MPs are seated but with a shape more similar to the GNAT hemicycle? To give you an idea it may look similar to this:

Draft A

The size of the dots, the spaces between rows, the curve of the arch, size of the center, all that can be change, and is as easy to update as it is using Parliamentary Tool. What do you think? --Dereck Camacho (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you give me the number of seats by party, each party tone color and where should they be located? --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the order is going to be the same then there's no need to change it. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes but I need to know where would be the location of the seats by party which I assume is different. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One more thing, can you place the right color code (for example in the case of black is #000000)? You can added next to the numbre of seats. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, these are the main versions I came up with using Flourish. Choose the one you seem best (I personally incline myself for # 2), small changes can be made but the general shape would be that. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1
2
3
File:After2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maia Mitchell bob haircut lengths[edit]

In these two edits, you classified pictures of the same person, at the same time (from the same video), into two different haircut categories. Unless her hair grew that much in the intervening seconds, I suspect at least one categorization must be incorrect. --GRuban (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GRuban: done. In some case, it is difficult to chose one length. If we had not neck length, chin should be good. So we should discuss the classifications, and see if we could add other categories. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Images du l'été[edit]

Non j'aurais pas des photos de l'été désolé معاذ عنابي (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Entissar Amer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ibrahim.ID 15:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Current[edit]

What exactly do you mean by "not an Islamic current"? Acxcossdamirror (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Acxcossdamirror: non denominal islam does not exist as branch. It is only a rhetoric. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There was a debate about this 3 or 4 years ago about whether it exists (see here). The response by the most reputable editors was that it indeed does exist. Acxcossdamirror (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Acxcossdamirror: personal opinion does not have any importance. The sources are clear. This current does not exit. In some case, shia or sunni muslim claim that to avoid the fitna or to claim that their movement is the true islam. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just because a religious branch is smaller than average doesn't mean its non-existent. So Quranism which has hundreds of websites as well as the 4th most active islamic subreddit doesn't exist? How can a group that constitutes the 4th most active Islamic subreddit be non-existent? See the Quraniyoon subreddit. Acxcossdamirror (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Acxcossdamirror: it is definietly NOT a religious branch. Reddit is not a reliable source. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In the United States, Pew Research reports that 65 percent of Muslims identify as Sunni, 11 percent as Shia, and the remainder as non-denominational Muslims; Another source from Brill Publishers. Since I have given you academic sources such as Brill Publishers, I believe you're incorrect. Acxcossdamirror (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Acxcossdamirror: it is source for self identification/denomination not about the fact that the current exist. NO the current DOES not exist. ANY academic source said the current exist. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy S9-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 07:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy S9+.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 07:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:171-365 - Some secrets were meant to be kept..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


"‪File:JohnJoelJoseph-819x1024.jpg‬"[edit]

There is no copyright infringement for this file and the two others (File:Rodolphe Jaar-819x1024.jpg File:Joseph Felix Badio-819x1024.jpg) As stated these files are public data from public body I don't understand your reference to facebook, it has nothing to do with the copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoseREMY (talk • contribs) 18:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Samsung Galaxy A5 & A3 (2016)-2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: The license of TouchWiz on this picture, does not allow use on Wikimedia Commons.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Hasung1120.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Galaxy A8 (13).png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: The license of the Samsung Experience in the picture, does not allow use on Wikimedia Commons.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Hajoon0102.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[edit]

Hi

The problem is there are no permision and the logos are copyvio from official website. The logo must be deleted.--Panam2014 (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure. But the no-perm-template, which you had removed, is also a sure path to deletion. However, it gives the uploader (or others) the chance to provide a permission. 1 week after tagging, the file will be speedied, if no permission provided. Generally: Depending on local legislation, logos sometimes may be below threshold of originality. This may be true for File:Logo-Les-Radicaux-de-Gauche-1568x800.png. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Dacia Logan Stepway (Rear).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(G)jabz (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dacia Logan Stepway (Front).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(G)jabz (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fanta Jelly! (4141577103).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Imes ES.png[edit]

Nominated for speedy deletion, according to your note at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Imes ES. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daily Express[edit]

Hello! I'm the author of this upload. Can you, please, review it and keep it, since I has updated the license? --Yeeeep nooope (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Abdul Aziz bin Habtoor3.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Abdul Aziz bin Habtoor3.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mehdi Al Mashat7.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mehdi Al Mashat7.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

25stargeneral (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]