User talk:ViperSnake151

Welcome to the Commons, Vipersnake151!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 17:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

CiD

Hallo. Sorry, I didnt know what is a pop-up, i thought that it was a hacker trap, if this image isnt allowed here, we must delete it.Marco 00:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

PD:i dont know what means CiD.

Image:Fedora7_gnome_desktop.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Fedora7_gnome_desktop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

FOP

Hi Vipersnake151. Could you give me the link to the policy regarding the freedom of an image in the USA and in the country it was taken? Does that include dictatures too? Thanks. Med 03:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, i have see this page. But what about that page stating the image must be legal in the USA and in the country in which it was taken. It really raises questions about pics taken in country led by a dictature. Med 00:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Flickr images

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Cheers, giggy _(:O) 07:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ping! I updated the userlist per your new name (please double check but it should all be good). giggy _(:O) 09:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Phill Niblock Undated.jpg

Hi. I've found it on the Phill_Niblock's page on the english wikipedia. I've just seen it's been removed on April 26th for missing sources [1]. Seems it should be deleted... Sorry. Regards. Xic667 13:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

About Image:Roche.svg

Hello,

It seems that your picture is ineligible to copyright, because it contains simple geometry. Off course, you're the author of this picture, but I'm nevertheless informing you that it can't be released under the terms of a Creative Commons license. I took the liberty to change this.

This image of simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.

Diti (talk to the penguin) 10:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the English/grammar fix. --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 22:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 8b6d1ca7bf81ef1c5a9c9f98d417c7b1

ok now what?

Urban explorer pic

I can see a person. There is a person in that picture, you just need to look a little closerAdam.J.W.C. (talk) 08:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Help:Mass deletion request

Please do a mass nom when nominating more than a handful of images for the same reason.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Otiñar

Hi. First of all sorry about my english. I read your succint motivation for my request. Why the licences are non-revocable? (this include CC-BY-SA?) There is another way to request the deletion of the files or any way to do something similar? Although I abandon the project, I still wait an answer in my disussion page. Thanks. --Otiñar (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The licences are non-revocable, because that is part of them. Read the full legal code of them. As soon as you have given away images under on of these licences, you can't revoke them, as long as we (Commons) or other image-users stay in full compliance to the licence rules. Only if we violate the rules (by not attributing you, and so on) you can terminate the licence, but not just because you have decided to not contribute anymore. -- Cecil (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons Scope - Pdf and Djvu files

I have added some text dealing with these based on the discussion on the talk page. Users are by no means unanimous about which files should be allowed, and I have tried to follow the majority opinion. Thus, the suggestion is that if a Pdf or Djvu file is educationally useful even to a single other Wiki it should be kept. Would you like to comment before this page goes live? Please do so at the bottom of the talk page. Regards, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Xbox-live-logo.png

Hi, could you please comment here? I don't mind of what pov you have, I just would like to finish this discussion soon. Thanks and cheers! Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 01:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:KingswayHaifa.JPG

Hi. About this image - I nominated it for deletion at first because of the license at flickr, but then I realized it can fall under PD-scan, and the uploader at flickr can't own it. Do you think I must be deleted because of the original license? thanks, Alonr (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Image deletion notification: Which picture do you mean?

Hello! On my talk page you wrote than an image (of mine) seems to be unfree. I would like to know which image you meant, can you help me? Thank you! Yours, Man77^"..."(de) 22:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Trademarks

Oops. Sorry for that. I'll try to remember this in the future. Teofilo (talk) 19:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pink octopus toy copie.png

Post your DR on the Original picture... or better, on all the categories related to toys or any object depicted in a photo. Only few thousand deletes to go Lilyu (talk) 03:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Whatever, dont post the copyvio tag on the duplicate file, but on the original file. I also try to tell you that yur point is concerning at least hundreds of images, you need to open a general discussion. A DR over one of the many categories might be the way. --Lilyu (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

URAA

Thank you for the explanation ! Teofilo (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Attributed image

I forwarded the email to Commons. Now what? What about every other image from his site that I download in the future? How do I avoid getting this annoying message again for each picture? Thanks.--PericlesofAthens (talk) 23:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll look for help here if anything goes wrong.--PericlesofAthens (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Um, does this usually take a long time? I still haven't gotten an email from a volunteer who might have read my email to Gary Lee Todd.--PericlesofAthens (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Dear ViperSnake151,
Thanks for your support of my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust.

Cheers, SterkeBak

Image:Raanana COA.jpg

Hi, thats what I tought. I even opened a request to delete it - Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Raanana COA.jpg, but as a user named Drork opened a new temaplte and said that the community is fine with this - I removed my deletion request. Perhaps you should clarify your opinion and Commons's policy in the above deletion request. Yonidebest Ω Talk 12:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

I wrote a detailed explanation about the concept of FOP in the Israeli law, how it relates to the IL municipality emblems, and why a country-specific FOP template is needed (there is also a FOP country-specific template for France). I hope this settles the issue. I'd be happy to elaborate on the subject if you still have some questions. Drork (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Permission

Nice work on this page. I have made a couple changes however — most important being that the OTRS volunteer will add the {{PermissionOTRS}} tag to the image, not the uploader. If you need anything else clarified feel free to ask. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 02:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:VK WikipediaBlock.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

haz (talk) 20:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello, ViperSnake151. You have new messages at Haza-w's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sopraintendenza

Hello,

Have you read the topic on Sopraintendenza in the village pump ? A long debate took place there in the last few days/weeks. Teofilo (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Blue_Eiffel_Tower_with_blue_sky.jpg

Hi, about File:Blue_Eiffel_Tower_with_blue_sky.jpg... Please explain better which is the problem with this image, my first language is not english... you say: "the lit tower is not an accessory to the rest of the image.", what does that mean? would you please explain me with more words? thank you very much.--Gussisaurio (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

• Hi. I understood. I uploaded a new version of the picture in wich the lighting of the tower is not longer the main topic of the picture: File:Blue_Eiffel_Tower_with_blue_sky.jpg, it is just an accessory of the landscape. Is this ok? --Gussisaurio (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Uploader unsure

Hello, I found this category and was wondering what is it for, since there's no template that uses it, it's empty, no page links to it, etc. Cheers, Patrícia ^msg 22:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not so sure it's ever going to be used... and to be honest, I think it encourages people to upload stuff they are unsure about in the first place. And then it's always the same people who have to clean up after... Just a thought. Patrícia ^msg 19:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Flickr CV

Is there a code to type in for Flickr CV's or do I have to look for it under my gadgets? I've not familiar with it. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:Published

Hi ViperSnake, thanks for modifying the template with the legal parameter. Is it possible to add these images to a category where other imagery from the commons have been used illegaly? not sure if theres a cat for it --PlaneMad 12:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Youre quick! thanks :) --PlaneMad 12:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Lisa Mitchell Picture

Hi, thanks:) But still, File:Lisa_Mitchell_(1).jpg has to be deleted, because now we've got the pic twice...--re^pat 16:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

FOSS logo

Hello! I took the liberty of modifying your FOSS portal logo by re-setting the text in Gentium Italic for better legibility and looks. My version is this one here -- if you want, feel free to replace your version with this. AKX (talk) 22:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, ViperSnake151. I talked AKX through getting a Commons account a few weeks ago (which didn't take very long) and stopped by to see how things are going. I honestly find the mk 2 FOSS logo much easier on the eye than your original one, especially as a small icon, the most common way of using it. If you have no objections, I'm going to try replacing the latter with the former in a while. --Kizor (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see the Meta page about rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Huib talk 21:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:PD-GDR stamps

Hello ViperSnake151,

because of your changes to the template and subpages all images with this template are now in the Category:Images using translated tags. Could you please fix that.

Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 08:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

CSS help

Are you any good at css? I'm not. I'm trying to migrate the standard cleanup style (yellow box) to MediaWiki:Common.css. The style I added was based on {{Description missing}} and the like. Which all use divs. However, I would like to apply this style to tables as well. Mainly, {{Meta-cleanup}}. As you can see, I'm having a problem with the width. Is there something I can add to the template or the css for tables only (table.cleanup instead of .cleanup)? I would like it to always be the same width, but only divs expand out to the margins. Any help would be appreciated. Rocket000 (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, then let's change the style in the css. But I'm not sure having many of the new style boxes inside the information template, like {{Description missing}}, would look good. Rocket000 (talk) 18:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposing it's not gonna do any good. We need to do it.. but like I said, I'm not good with css. Rocket000 (talk) 20:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Could you please explain further...

Everyone at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:PD-Afghanistan is wondering about your reasoning. Could you please return there and explain yourself? Geo Swan (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Why?

you deleted that conmemorative coin. It is in public domain. The atomium is no a sculpture! please explain me better OboeCrack (talk) 14:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Legend?

What "legend" does the file, Roche.svg refer to? Fangusu (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

no response

Can you please present any evidence of copyright infringement here [2] or else i will remove the tag tomorrow October 9th and report anon user for Vandalism. Iberieli (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Your rollback rights

I suggested in Commons talk:Freedom of panorama#Ukraine and other OK/not OK wording removals that maybe your rollback rights should be recalled. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:Images_used_by_media_organizations_but_violating_license_terms

Category discussion notification

Category:Images_used_by_media_organizations_but_violating_license_terms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Template:FOP-cv

Template:FOP-cv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Times Square Ball from above.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Times Square Ball from above.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

File:갤럭시노트3의 이미지입니다 2013-09-08 00-29.jpeg

File:갤럭시노트3의 이미지입니다 2013-09-08 00-29.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 03:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG G2 (Black).jpg

Hello, I commented to Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG G2 (Black).jpg. thanks. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

BlackBerry passport photos

I'm ok with the removal of BlackBerry's OS screenshot. But I don't understand the rationale (or copyright issues) of removing File:BlackBerry Passport screenshot.png. We have File:IPhone 6 unboxing.jpg that is identical in nature and included in iPhone 6 article. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 00:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello ViperSnake151. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:58, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Wii U GamePad E3 2012-1.jpg

File:Wii U GamePad E3 2012-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gazebo (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Presentation of Samsung Galaxy S4 (2013-03-14) 06.jpg

About your nomination. Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Krassotkin or history. And remove the speedy template or replace with a regular deletion request. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Marvel Music logo.png

File:Marvel Music logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 05:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Xbox One console and controller at Gamescom 2013.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:Fairusenote

Template:Fairusenote has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

storia licenza

Azzeccagarbugli

Ciao @ViperSnake151: , Vedo che sei tato tu a creare nel 2008 questo Template:Soprintendenza. Siccome sto cerdando di districarmi tra le molte varianti della licenza PD old e PD art. so che il Codice Beni culturali viena di fotografare a scopo di lucro i beni culturali di Stato, Regioni enti locali, come è venuta fuori questa bella licenza un po' da azzeccagarbugli? Ciao--Susanna Giaccai (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Auto non-free

Template:Auto non-free has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/Leonel Sohns 19:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Auto non-free/lang

Template:Auto non-free/lang has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/Leonel Sohns 19:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:France-cv

Template:France-cv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion Nomination - File:230 South Park Ave Building.png

On the log, add : {{User talk:ViperSnake151}}

File:230 South Park Ave Building.png

Suspected copyvio per COM:PCP and user's other uploads. RamsesTimeGame (talk) 06:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

This was my own work and somehow, it gets a CopyVio. RamsesTimeGame (talk) 06:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Android 4.4 with stock launcher.png

File:Android 4.4 with stock launcher.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2806:264:4484:96BA:8591:1579:D4A2:69FC 18:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Private window in Firefox 68.png

File:Private window in Firefox 68.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Cyanogen recovery from the nexus q!.jpg

File:Cyanogen recovery from the nexus q!.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Артём 13327 (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

File:VK WikipediaBlock.png

File:VK WikipediaBlock.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

20 upper 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning orange.svg

File:Ambox warning orange.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:4451:866E:4700:4459:5E71:FE12:C12C 03:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning orange.svg

File:Ambox warning orange.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjhpaz (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)